September Housing Data Show Further Market Weakness

Illustration for: September Housing Data Show Further Market Weakness
AI-generated illustration. Visual interpretation does not represent real individuals or scenes.

THE BARE STORY

U.S. pending home sales fell 7.3% in September from the previous month and 11.3% from a year earlier, reaching their lowest level in records dating to 2001, according to the National Association of Realtors.

The Commerce Department said privately owned housing starts declined at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.2% in September, while building permits slipped 0.2%. Single-family permits fell 4% from August to 845,000, the lowest level since 2023, according to the department.

Lawrence Yun, the realtors’ association’s chief economist, said rapidly rising mortgage rates had weakened housing conditions beyond what income and job growth could offset. Chris Rupkey, chief economist at Fwdbonds, said housing would face a severe slowdown without federal policies aimed at reducing home prices.

The figures came as the Federal Reserve prepared for an interest-rate decision next week. The CME FedWatch Tool showed traders pricing an 82% probability that the central bank would leave rates unchanged, while investors awaited further labor, business activity and inflation data.

Same Facts. Different Perspectives.

Two AI models. Two viewpoints. One factual foundation.

Read the headline again: "Further Market Weakness." Weak for whom?

Pending home sales hit their lowest level since the National Association of Realtors began keeping records in 2001. That includes the 2008 crash, when the financial system was on fire. Single-family permits fell to 845,000, the lowest since 2023. Housing starts dropped again. For a realtor or a publicly traded builder, that is a crisis. For a 31-year-old renter splitting a two-bedroom with a stranger, it is the same crisis they have lived in for ten years, now with a data point attached.

The market isn't weak so much as frozen. Lawrence Yun, the realtors' chief economist, says rapidly rising mortgage rates have overwhelmed whatever help buyers get from income and job growth. That is the mechanism, and it should make us angry. A family can do everything right, keep its job, get raises, save a down payment, and still be priced out because the cost of borrowing moved. Homeowners who locked in cheap loans won't sell and give up that rate. Buyers can't afford the rate on offer. Builders, facing expensive financing, pull back and don't add the supply that would break the standoff. Everyone is rationally stuck, and the people with the least are stuck hardest.

Then comes the most revealing line in the story. Chris Rupkey says housing faces a severe slowdown without federal policies aimed at reducing home prices. Notice how unusual that sentence is. For decades, Washington's bipartisan housing policy has been to keep prices rising: mortgage subsidies, tax breaks for owners, and a political class that treats any drop in home values as a threat to be managed. We built the central savings vehicle of the American middle class on scarcity, then acted surprised when a generation couldn't get in.

The Fed is expected to hold rates steady next week, with traders putting it at 82%. I'm not going to pretend central bankers should set rates to please buyers. But officials should stop treating housing as collateral damage to be examined after the inflation fight is declared won. Shelter is among the largest costs families face. A policy that fights inflation by strangling new construction can leave housing costlier for years, because homes that don't get built now do not exist later.

This is where my own side deserves blame. Democrats run the places where the shortage is worst: California, New York, Massachusetts, Washington. These are jurisdictions where the party talks constantly about affordability while its own coalition of homeowners shows up at hearings to block apartments near their streets. Calling it "neighborhood character" does not change what it is: a wealth-protection racket with a progressive bumper sticker. If you say housing is a right and then fight a four-story building, you don't believe what you say.

What would a serious Left response look like? First, build, and make it easy: end exclusionary zoning, legalize apartments near transit, and cut the permit delays that kill projects before the first shovel. Second, stop leaving the whole job to private developers who build only when financing and margins are perfect. Federal and state money should finance mixed-income and social housing at scale, through public development or low-cost capital for nonprofits, with counter-cyclical funding that keeps building when the private market stalls. A downturn like this is exactly when the public sector should be pouring concrete, not waiting for rates to move.

Third, stop pretending that falling prices from real supply and rising prices from scarcity are the same thing for families. Homeowners are not villains, and most are just trying to hold onto what they have. But a country cannot run a housing system whose success depends on the next generation paying more.

The realtors are right that this market is sick. They are wrong about the diagnosis. The sickness isn't that fewer houses are changing hands. It's that too few homes exist, and the rules and the rate environment now guarantee fewer.

How it may affect me

If you're shopping for a home, your monthly payment is being driven more by mortgage rates than by price, so compare rate quotes from multiple lenders and run the numbers at different rates. If you rent, weak construction now points to tight supply and upward rent pressure later. Check local zoning and permitting votes, where much of the outcome is decided.

Read the story at

Note: All TheBareNews content is AI-generated. For additional context, reporting, and updates, you are invited to explore the news outlets linked above.

Stories You May Have Missed