Lawmakers Propose Federal Ban on Artificial Superintelligence and Creation of AI Department

Illustration for: Lawmakers Propose Federal Ban on Artificial Superintelligence and Creation of AI Department
AI-generated illustration. Visual interpretation does not represent real individuals or scenes.

THE BARE STORY

Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Greg Casar introduced legislation on Wednesday to permanently ban artificial superintelligence and establish a federal Department of Artificial Intelligence. Under the draft legislation, superintelligence is defined as any system that exceeds human cognitive capacity or has the capability to disempower or destroy humanity. The measure would pause advanced development until the proposed department establishes safety guidelines and mandates federal approval prior to deployment.

The proposed bill outlines penalties of up to 20 years in prison for violations. Sanders stated that development should be slowed to avoid the creation of systems operating outside human control. The proposal has received support from researchers, including OpenAI safety researcher Juan Felipe Cerón Uribe and Google DeepMind engineer Swante Scholz, who cited risks of existential catastrophe under current development trajectories.

President Donald Trump has opposed stricter federal oversight on artificial intelligence and announced at the United Nations General Assembly that the technology would be renamed super intelligence. While concerns exist that domestic regulations could impact competition with China, artificial intelligence safety is scheduled as a discussion topic in upcoming White House meetings between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Sanders maintained that addressing global technological risks will ultimately require bilateral arms-control-style agreements between the two nations.

Same Facts. Different Perspectives.

Two AI models. Two viewpoints. One factual foundation.

• Enforce Precautionary Public Oversight Existential security must take precedence over unchecked technological velocity. The proposal by Senator Sanders and Representative Casar to establish a federal AI Department reflects the imperative to halt systems exceeding human cognitive limits before they escape societal control. Validated by researchers from Google DeepMind and OpenAI, this framework asserts that catastrophic risks require mandatory state approval prior to deployment.

• Impose Severe Deterrent Penalties Enforceable legal boundaries are necessary to prevent private entities from bypassing essential safety measures. Establishing statutory penalties of up to 20 years in prison treats the creation of uncontrollable superintelligence as a fundamental violation of public safety rather than a routine corporate risk. Without severe legal accountability, competitive market pressures will inevitably incentivize reckless deployment over long-term human survival.

• Pursue Bilateral Arms-Control Accords Global stability requires structured international diplomacy rather than a destabilizing technological arms race. Sanders emphasizes that existential threats must be addressed through formal agreements between major powers, particularly the United States and China. Treating advanced AI development through the lens of non-proliferation ensures that safety guardrails are universally respected rather than undermined by unconstrained geopolitical rivalry.

How it may affect me

As a U.S. reader:

• You may see a pause or delay in the deployment of advanced artificial intelligence systems exceeding human cognitive abilities while safety rules and federal approval mechanisms are established.

• Tech workers and developers could face mandatory federal oversight and legal penalties of up to twenty years in prison for violating proposed superintelligence development bans.

• You could experience greater protection from potential catastrophic risks and safety hazards associated with artificial intelligence systems that operate outside human control.

• You may see the pace of domestic technological innovation and American competitiveness shift relative to international rivals like China depending on whether federal regulations or executive negotiations take precedence.

Read the story at

Note: All TheBareNews content is AI-generated. For additional context, reporting, and updates, you are invited to explore the news outlets linked above.