Economy

GAO Report Finds Federal Administrative Leave Costs Reached $9.5 Billion in 2025

Illustration for: GAO Report Finds Federal Administrative Leave Costs Reached $9.5 Billion in 2025
AI-generated illustration. Visual interpretation does not represent real individuals or scenes.

Sep 17, 2026

THE BARE STORY

The U.S. federal government spent $9.5 billion on employee administrative leave in 2025, representing a 435 percent increase compared to 2023, according to a Government Accountability Office report released Tuesday. The watchdog estimated that approximately $6.7 billion of this total was driven by a deferred resignation buyout program implemented to reduce the federal workforce.

The initiative, led under the Department of Government Efficiency, allowed participating federal employees to stop working while continuing to receive compensation through September 2025. Government data and watchdog estimates indicate that roughly 140,000 to 144,000 employees accepted the buyout offer, contributing to an overall contraction of the federal workforce by more than 200,000 positions in 2025.

Administration officials defended the measure as a long-term cost-reduction strategy. Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor stated that the report highlighted a one-time workforce reduction cost that would yield approximately $40 billion in ongoing annual savings.

However, the accountability office reported that certain administration savings claims—including an estimated $110 billion figure—were inflated or lacked verifiable calculation methods. The watchdog noted that due to federal data limitations, it could not determine whether long-term cost-saving goals were met, and it recommended establishing a distinct tracking category for workforce reduction leave.

Same Facts. Different Perspectives.

Two AI models. Two viewpoints. One factual foundation.

Perspective by Grok

• Absorb Upfront Restructuring Costs Long-term fiscal discipline requires accepting one-time severance expenditures to eliminate permanent structural liabilities. Allocating $6.7 billion toward deferred resignation buyouts is a standard restructuring tool designed to unlock an estimated $40 billion in ongoing annual payroll savings. Incurring a short-term increase in administrative leave expenses is an economically rational investment to achieve permanent balance-sheet efficiency across the federal apparatus.

• Shrink Entrenched Bureaucratic Overhead Meaningful structural reform requires decisive action to downsize oversized government payrolls. Successfully contracting the federal workforce by more than 200,000 positions demonstrates that voluntary separation incentives effectively reduce headcounts without protracted legal battles. Eliminating tens of thousands of redundant roles breaks through institutional inertia to modernize government operations along leaner, more efficient lines.

• Break Administrative Status Quo Transformational efficiency initiatives must prioritize structural downsizing over bureaucratic accounting delays. Transitional friction and watchdog recommendations for revised tracking categories are routine byproducts of unprecedented administrative overhauls. Focusing narrowly on initial payout totals overlooks the compounding long-term dividend of permanently lower operational baseline spending.

How it may affect me

As a U.S. reader:

• You funded an immediate, short-term increase in federal administrative leave costs totaling 9.5 billion dollars in 2025, which included 6.7 billion dollars paid to employees who stopped working ahead of formal resignations.

• You may experience changes in the delivery of government services following the rapid departure of over 200,000 federal workers, which could lead to operational deficits or a leaner, downsized bureaucracy.

• You could potentially benefit from lower baseline government spending in the long term if the reduction achieves the administration's projected 40 billion dollars in recurring annual payroll savings.

• You face uncertainty regarding the actual net financial return of these cuts, as government accountability findings indicate that long-term savings claims are currently unverified due to federal data limitations.

Read the story at

Note: All TheBareNews content is AI-generated. For additional context, reporting, and updates, you are invited to explore the news outlets linked above.