Pentagon Dismisses Stars and Stripes Publisher, Editor-in-Chief, and Reporter

2026-08-22

The BareStory

The Pentagon on Friday dismissed the publisher, editor-in-chief, and a Middle East reporter of the military newspaper *Stars and Stripes*, citing insubordination as the official reason. Publisher Max Lederer, Editor-in-Chief Erik Slavin, and reporter Lara Korte have been given five days to appeal their terminations.

According to Slavin and Korte, the allegations of insubordination stemmed from their participation in a television program in July regarding the Pentagon's plans to overhaul the publication. Slavin stated that his dismissal notice cited his televised comments warning that censoring news for service members would cross a red line. Korte stated that she was terminated for asserting she works for the military community rather than the Pentagon or any administration. Lederer, who has served as publisher for 19 years, had previously announced plans to retire at the end of September due to policy differences with leadership.

The terminations come amid a broader effort to reform the taxpayer-funded publication, which was initiated in January by Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell. Under the plan, the Department of War aims to modernize operations and refocus content on military-specific topics, such as weapons systems and fitness, while removing wire reprints. As part of these changes, the Pentagon also dismissed the newspaper's ombudsman in April.

In response to the dismissals, White House adviser Stephen Miller expressed confidence that the terminations were for just cause. Meanwhile, Captain William Urban, the newly appointed military deputy to the publisher, issued an open letter outlining plans to expand the paper's digital reach while maintaining its professional journalism and editorial independence.

Left Perspective

Shielding Independent Democratic Oversight
Resisting Systemic Informational Censorship
The Threat of Ideological Compliance

Right Perspective

Enforcing Organizational Chain of Command
Aligning Resources with Strategic Mission
Preventing Institutional Anarchy

Left Perspective

• Shielding Independent Democratic Oversight Civil liberties and institutional transparency depend entirely on preserving a press free from executive intimidation, even within military-adjacent organizations. Terminating Publisher Max Lederer, Editor-in-Chief Erik Slavin, and reporter Lara Korte for asserting their duty to the military community rather than the Pentagon hierarchy represents a severe blow to government accountability. A taxpayer-funded publication must serve as an open forum of truth for service members rather than an unquestioning mouthpiece for leadership, making the defense of editorial independence a necessity, not an act of insubordination.

• Resisting Systemic Informational Censorship The systematic removal of independent oversight—beginning with the dismissal of the newspaper's ombudsman in April and culminating in these high-level firings—signals a coordinated effort to sanitize military journalism. Framing the removal of wire reprints and the transition to narrow topics like fitness and weapons systems as "modernization" is a strategic maneuver to eliminate critical external perspectives and suppress dissenting views. When journalists are punished for warning that censoring news crosses a dangerous red line, the institution betrays its commitment to the very democratic values service members are sworn to protect.

• The Threat of Ideological Compliance Allowing political figures like White House adviser Stephen Miller to endorse these terminations creates a chilling effect that threatens the integrity of public service. When professional staff are forced out for refusing to pledge blind loyalty to an administrative hierarchy, it establishes a precedent where partisan compliance is valued over professional truth-telling. The long-term risk of this consolidation of power is the transformation of a vital military resource into a hollow tool of state-directed public relations, leaving service members intellectually isolated.

Right Perspective

• Enforcing Organizational Chain of Command The preservation of social order and institutional continuity relies on a clear, functioning chain of command within all defense-related entities. The dismissals of Slavin and Korte for insubordination are direct consequences of employees using external public forums in July to openly criticize and actively resist organizational reforms authorized by leadership. In a highly structured, taxpayer-funded military ecosystem, public insubordination undermines institutional discipline and cannot be tolerated under the guise of professional independence.

• Aligning Resources with Strategic Mission The modernization plan initiated in January by Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell is a necessary exercise in fiscal discipline and strategic refocusing. Prioritizing military-specific topics like weapons systems and fitness while removing redundant wire reprints ensures that the publication directly supports the core mission of service readiness. Removing legacy personnel who actively obstruct this transition, while installing new leadership like Captain William Urban, is a legitimate and necessary administrative action to ensure the organization's evolution matches contemporary defense priorities.

• Preventing Institutional Anarchy Allowing individual employees of a government-funded entity to declare that they do not work for the governing department or the sitting administration creates a dangerous precedent of bureaucratic insubordination. White House adviser Stephen Miller’s affirmation of the terminations reflects the necessity of maintaining executive authority over subordinate federal programs. If agencies cannot dismiss personnel who reject their organizational oversight, the entire structure of democratic governance and administrative accountability risks collapsing into localized insurrections.

How it may affect me

As a U.S. reader:

• Taxpayers will see the funding of the military publication shifted toward a modernized program focused strictly on defense readiness, weapons systems, and fitness, rather than general news reprints.

• Members of the public who monitor government transparency may see a decline in independent media oversight of military leadership due to the removal of the publication's top editors and ombudsman.

• Readers can expect the military publication to expand its digital reach in the short term, though the content will be more narrowly tailored to specific defense topics.

• In the long term, families of service members may find that their relatives in the military have less access to diverse external viewpoints and critical news within their primary service-focused publication.

Pentagon Dismisses Stars and Stripes Publisher, Editor-in-Chief, and Reporter

The BareStory

Left Perspective

Right Perspective

How it may affect me

Read the story at