Financial Disclosures Show Representative Ro Khanna’s Family Trusts Traded Up to $165 Million in 2025

2026-08-21

The BareStory

According to recently filed financial disclosures, the family trusts of U.S. Representative Ro Khanna of California conducted 5,402 trades during 2025, totaling up to $165.4 million in volume. The transactions included more than $70.6 million in sales of stocks, options, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and hedge funds. Khanna has stated that he does not have any knowledge of or say in the trades, which are managed by trusts established by his father-in-law, Monte Ahuja.

The disclosures show that Khanna's estimated net worth reached up to $167 million by the end of 2025, an increase from a maximum of $78 million when he first entered Congress in 2017. Due to congressional reporting rules that require assets to be reported in broad ranges, his precise net worth remains uncertain. Additionally, the filings indicate his family received up to $10.8 million in passive income in 2025. Khanna's office declined to comment on the disclosures.

The filings come as Khanna advocates for a proposed 5% wealth tax on billionaires in California. Under the proposal, billionaires who lack liquid assets could pledge company shares to the state. Billionaire Mark Cuban has strongly criticized the proposal, arguing it would drive businesses out of California. Prior to January 1 of this year, several California billionaires relocated to Florida or Texas.

Left Perspective

Shielding Public Office Integrity
Dismantling Systemic Economic Disparity
Resisting Oligarchical Capital Flight

Right Perspective

Exposing Capital Flight Realities
Highlighting Regulatory Policy Contradictions
Defending Private Property Rights

Left Perspective

• Shielding Public Office Integrity Ethical public service requires a robust firewall between personal assets and legislative duties to prevent conflicts of interest. The fact that Representative Khanna's $165.4 million in family trust trades are managed entirely by his father-in-law, Monte Ahuja, without the Congressman's knowledge or input, demonstrates a successful adherence to structured ethical boundaries. This clear separation ensures that his legislative actions remain untainted by personal financial gains, reinforcing public trust in democratic institutions.

• Dismantling Systemic Economic Disparity Achieving true social equity requires those who benefit most from the economic system to contribute proportionately to the public good. Khanna's advocacy for a 5% wealth tax on California billionaires, despite his family trust's net worth rising to an estimated $167 million and generating up to $10.8 million in passive income, shows a commitment to systemic reform over personal self-interest. From this perspective, progressive taxation is a vital mechanism to fund public services, rejecting the notion that personal affluence should shield elite wealth from democratic redistribution.

• Resisting Oligarchical Capital Flight Prioritizing human welfare over corporate pressure is essential to preventing the extraction of public resources by private interests. Warnings from figures like Mark Cuban that wealth taxes will drive businesses out of California are seen as defensive rhetoric designed to protect concentrated capital. The relocation of several billionaires to Florida and Texas represents an expected, but ultimately manageable, friction in the necessary pursuit of progressive tax structures, which must not be derailed by the threats of mobile capital.

Right Perspective

• Exposing Capital Flight Realities Economic prosperity depends on maintaining a competitive environment that incentivizes capital investment and business retention. The relocation of several California billionaires to low-tax states like Florida and Texas before January 1 validates the market realist warning that punitive taxation actively drives productive capital out of the state. Mark Cuban’s warning that a 5% wealth tax would damage the state's economy highlights how aggressive redistribution policies ultimately erode the tax base and harm long-term systemic stability.

• Highlighting Regulatory Policy Contradictions Policy-making should be grounded in practical economic realities rather than ideological gestures that conflict with private wealth generation. Representative Khanna's family trust conducting 5,402 trades and generating up to $10.8 million in passive income in 2025 demonstrates the natural utility of market mechanisms and capital accumulation. Championing a wealth tax while actively benefiting from rapid capital growth—increasing his family's estimated net worth from a maximum of $78 million in 2017 to $167 million in 2025—reveals an unsustainable disconnect between progressive political rhetoric and wealth-generating market realities.

• Defending Private Property Rights Market efficiency requires clear, unencumbered ownership of assets without state intervention or forced equity relinquishment. The proposal allowing illiquid billionaires to pledge company shares to the state of California represents a dangerous encroachment on private property rights and corporate governance. Forcing private individuals to hand over equity stakes to government entities threatens corporate stability, disrupts market valuations, and undermines the foundational incentives that drive entrepreneurial innovation.

How it may affect me

As a U.S. reader:

• In the short or long term, the implementation of a proposed wealth tax could increase funding for public services, but it could also erode the local tax base if wealthy residents continue to relocate to states like Florida and Texas.

• Members of the public in states experiencing capital flight could see reduced economic activity, while residents in states receiving relocated billionaires and businesses may experience shifts in their local job markets.

• Regular employees and retail investors could face corporate instability or disrupted market valuations if a wealth tax forces business owners to pledge company shares to state governments.

• Citizens may experience increased trust in democratic institutions if lawmakers successfully maintain a strict separation between their public duties and their family trusts' private financial activities.

Financial Disclosures Show Representative Ro Khanna’s Family Trusts Traded Up to $165 Million in 2025

The BareStory

Left Perspective

Right Perspective

How it may affect me

Read the story at