James Comey Files Motions to Dismiss Charges in President Trump Threat Case

2026-07-29

The BareStory

Former FBI Director James Comey has filed legal motions in a North Carolina federal court seeking to dismiss charges accusing him of threatening President Donald Trump. The indictment, returned in April, stems from a May 2025 social media post featuring seashells on a beach arranged to form the numbers "86 47." In restaurant terminology, "86" is slang meaning to remove an item, and Trump is the 47th U.S. president. Comey is scheduled for arraignment on September 30 in New Bern, North Carolina, on two counts related to making and transmitting threats.

In the court filings, Comey's defense team, which includes attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, argued for dismissal on the grounds of selective and vindictive prosecution. The defense alleged that the Justice Department targeted Comey due to retaliatory pressure and personal animus from the president. Additionally, Comey’s lawyers accused the U.S. Secret Service of conducting illegal, warrantless electronic tracking of Comey's phone, claiming that agency personnel internally questioned the legality of the surveillance but proceeded at the request of a senior Justice Department official. The defense also asserted that warrant applications in the case contained falsehoods and relied on a biased witness.

The Department of Justice and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche have denied any political motivations in the prosecution. Government representatives stated that local North Carolina prosecutors spearheaded the case, asserting that threatening the president is a serious matter. A Department of Justice spokesperson stated that a grand jury indicted Comey and that he would receive a standard legal proceeding in court.

This case follows the dismissal of a prior federal indictment against Comey last year in Virginia, which had accused him of lying to Congress. In that case, a judge dismissed the charges after ruling that the prosecutor, a former personal attorney for Trump, had been unconstitutionally appointed to the position.

Left Perspective

Dismantling Warrantless State Surveillance
Exposing Politicized Selective Prosecution
Shielding Free Expression From Overreach

Right Perspective

Enforcing Rules Against Presidential Threats
Upholding Local Judicial Sovereignty
Neutralizing Deflective Procedural Maneuvers

Left Perspective

• Dismantling Warrantless State Surveillance Government accountability and civil liberties must be protected against illegal, overreaching state surveillance. The defense's allegation that the U.S. Secret Service conducted warrantless electronic tracking of Comey's phone—despite internal agency warnings regarding its illegality—demonstrates how easily federal law enforcement can be weaponized against citizens. Protecting individual privacy from unauthorized executive intrusion is paramount, especially when surveillance is initiated at the quiet request of a senior Justice Department official.

• Exposing Politicized Selective Prosecution Justice systems must remain blind and independent of personal political vendettas. The indictment of Comey represents a pattern of selective, vindictive prosecution driven by retaliatory pressure and personal animus from the president. This pattern is underscored by the previous dismissal of a separate federal case against Comey in Virginia, which was thrown out because the prosecutor was an unconstitutionally appointed former personal attorney for the president, illustrating a deep-seated bias that undermines judicial integrity.

• Shielding Free Expression From Overreach State power must not be used to criminalize symbolic political dissent or abstract speech. Characterizing a social media post of seashells arranged as "86 47" as a literal criminal threat relies on extreme leaps in logic and a biased witness. When the state uses falsehoods in warrant applications to prosecute a public figure over restaurant slang, it establishes a chilling precedent that threatens the broader public's right to free speech and peaceful expression.

Right Perspective

• Enforcing Rules Against Presidential Threats Maintaining social order and national stability requires the absolute protection of the head of state from potential harm. The indictment of Comey on two counts of making and transmitting threats via his "86 47" social media post reflects a necessary enforcement of the rule of law. Coded threats targeting the commander-in-chief are a serious national security concern, and no individual’s former high-ranking status should exempt them from being held accountable for inciting or implying violence.

• Upholding Local Judicial Sovereignty The integrity of the justice system relies on local institutions and standard, established legal processes. This prosecution is spearheaded by local North Carolina prosecutors and validated by a grand jury indictment, confirming that the case is moving through the proper, decentralized constitutional channels. As stated by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Department of Justice representatives, the standard legal proceeding in court ensures that the law is applied equitably, free from central political interference.

• Neutralizing Deflective Procedural Maneuvers Preserving public trust in the judiciary requires resolving criminal allegations on their actual merits rather than allowing procedural distractions to derail justice. Defense claims regarding warrantless tracking, selective prosecution, and past dismissed cases in Virginia are strategic efforts to divert attention from the core issue of the threatening post. The legal system must resist these technical dismissals and proceed to trial to ensure that the facts surrounding the alleged threat are fully evaluated under the law.

How it may affect me

As a U.S. reader:

• You may experience heightened concerns over personal privacy and digital surveillance if federal agencies are found to be using unauthorized, warrantless phone tracking.

• You could see a potential chilling effect on your online free speech and symbolic political expression if the court allows the prosecution of coded or abstract social media posts.

• You may feel reassured that the rule of law is applied equitably and national stability is protected, as former high-ranking officials face standard court proceedings for alleged presidential threats.

• Your trust in the fairness of the justice system could be influenced by whether this case is determined to be a standard, local grand jury proceeding or a politically motivated, selective prosecution.

James Comey Files Motions to Dismiss Charges in President Trump Threat Case

The BareStory

Left Perspective

Right Perspective

How it may affect me

Read the story at