Illustration for: Family of Colombian Man Killed in US Strike Files Human Rights Complaint
AI-generated illustration. Visual interpretation does not represent real individuals or scenes.

Family of Colombian Man Killed in US Strike Files Human Rights Complaint

2025-12-03

The BareStory

The family of a Colombian man killed in a U.S. military strike has filed a complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, alleging he was murdered. Alejandro Carranza, 42, died on September 15 when his boat was struck in the Caribbean Sea. His family insists he was a fisherman with no connections to drug trafficking. According to U.S. officials, a total of three people were killed in the September 15 strike.

The incident was part of a U.S. anti-narcotics military campaign in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific that officials say has killed more than 80 people since it began in September. The campaign was ordered by President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. President Trump stated he ordered the strike on Carranza's boat, which he insisted was carrying drugs from Venezuela. Secretary Hegseth has maintained the strikes are legal and that the military has evidence the targeted boats were carrying narcotics.

In the complaint, Carranza's family alleges that Secretary Hegseth was responsible for ordering "extra-judicial killings." Colombian President Gustavo Petro has accused the U.S. of murder and violating his country's sovereignty. President Petro stated that Carranza’s boat was adrift and displaying a distress signal. Carranza's widow, Katerine Hernandez, said her husband was a "good man" and questioned why he was not detained instead of killed. He is survived by four children.

The complaint was filed with a quasi-judicial body whose rulings are not legally binding on the United States. In the U.S., some lawmakers from both political parties, along with legal experts and rights groups, have questioned the legality of the strikes. A Pentagon official said the department does not comment on pending litigation. Secretary Hegseth recently defended the strikes as a form of deterrence, stating on Tuesday that a recent pause in activity was due to it being "hard to find boats to strike."

Left Perspective

  • Alejandro Carranza was an innocent fisherman who was murdered.
  • The U.S. strike was an illegal "extra-judicial killing."
  • The U.S. violated Colombian sovereignty and attacked a vessel in distress.

Right Perspective

  • The strike was a legal component of an anti-narcotics campaign.
  • The specific boat targeted was carrying drugs.
  • The military strikes function as an effective deterrent.

How it may affect me

As a U.S. reader:

• The human rights complaint and questions from some lawmakers could lead to a review of the rules of engagement for U.S. anti-narcotics military operations.

• The military campaign, described by officials as a deterrent, could disrupt trafficking routes, potentially affecting the domestic supply and availability of illegal drugs.

• Accusations of murder from Colombia's president may strain diplomatic relations, which could impact future cooperation between the U.S. and that nation.

Read the story at