Illustration for: Nvidia and Investor Michael Burry Clash Over AI Bubble Claims
AI-generated illustration. Visual interpretation does not represent real individuals or scenes.

Nvidia and Investor Michael Burry Clash Over AI Bubble Claims

2025-11-25

The BareStory

Investor Michael Burry has publicly argued that the artificial intelligence market is a bubble centered on chipmaker Nvidia, drawing parallels to the telecom infrastructure boom of the late 1990s. In response, Nvidia reportedly circulated a private memo to financial analysts disputing his claims. Burry, known for a successful bet against the 2008 housing market, later acknowledged the memo and stated he stood by his analysis.

Burry's argument, based in part on research from his former associate, suggests that massive capital investments in AI infrastructure far outpace the economic demand for the technology. The analysis highlights a disparity between AI service revenue and the trillions of dollars projected for data center spending. It is argued this mirrors the overbuilding of fiber-optic networks that preceded a market collapse in the early 2000s when supply outstripped demand. It has been reported that Burry is taking short positions against AI-related companies.

The dispute involves specific financial claims and counter-claims. Burry has questioned Nvidia's stock buyback figures and suggested that customers overstate the useful lifespan of its graphics processing units (GPUs) to justify spending. He also raised the possibility of "circular financing."

In its memo, Nvidia countered these points, asserting its share repurchase figures were lower than Burry alleged due to a miscalculation on his part. The company stated its GPUs are depreciated by customers over four to six years based on real-world longevity and that older models remain in high use. Nvidia also rejected the circular financing suggestion, stating its strategic investments are a small fraction of its revenue.

Left Perspective

  • The AI market is a bubble analogous to past tech collapses.
  • Capital investment in AI far exceeds its current economic demand.
  • Proponents question the financial reporting and practices of key companies.

Right Perspective

  • Financial claims made by critics are based on miscalculations.
  • The lifespan and value of its products are based on real-world use.
  • Strategic investments are a minor part of its business and not used to inflate demand.

How it may affect me

As a U.S. reader:

• A potential AI market downturn, if the bubble theory is correct, could negatively impact retirement savings and investments tied to major technology stocks.

• The outcome of this dispute may affect the pace of AI development; a slowdown in investment could delay new AI-powered products and services.

• A reduction in projected data center spending could affect future job growth in the technology and construction sectors involved in building this infrastructure.

Read the story at