Maine Senate Candidate Calls for Abolishing ICE, Breaking Up Tech Firms

2025-11-23

The BareStory

Graham Platner, a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate in Maine, made a series of statements on U.S. immigration, technology companies, and political tactics during a town hall in Windham on a Saturday.

At the event, Platner called for the abolition of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). He stated that if he had his way, he would have every ICE agent testify before a Senate subcommittee without masks. Platner said that "people need to go to prison" for the agency's actions and accused agents of "kidnapping people from the streets."

Platner also advocated for breaking up large technology companies, stating that if it were up to him, firms like Google and Palantir "wouldn’t exist." He claimed these companies use personal data to take money from consumers and keep people angry at one another. To counter this, Platner said he would use "old fashioned ways" like winning elections to apply monopoly law and reform the tax code.

Additionally, Platner urged his supporters to publicly confront members of Maine's congressional delegation who do not support Medicare for All. He said he wants his supporters to ensure these officials cannot "have a public dinner without getting yelled at," describing this as a way to "impose costs" and exercise power. His economic platform also includes expanding Social Security and increasing taxes on corporations and billionaires to reclaim money he said was "stolen from the working people."

Platner’s campaign did not respond to requests for comment regarding his remarks at the town hall.

Left Perspective

Federal agencies must be held accountable for abuses.
Large technology companies harm consumers and society.
Economic justice requires direct action and wealth redistribution.

Right Perspective

The platform calls for abolishing a federal law enforcement agency.
The agenda includes breaking up major American corporations.
The proposed political tactics involve public confrontation.

Left Perspective

• Federal agencies must be held accountable for abuses. Graham Platner argues for the abolition of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), based on accusations of severe misconduct by its agents. According to the candidate, agents are responsible for "kidnapping people from the streets," and he stated that "people need to go to prison" for the agency's actions. He proposes using Senate subcommittees to compel agents to testify without masks as a measure of accountability.

• Large technology companies harm consumers and society. Platner believes that major tech firms like Google and Palantir should be broken up because they are detrimental to the public. He claims these companies manipulate personal data to extract money from consumers and intentionally foster public anger. To address this, he advocates using existing legal and political tools, such as monopoly law and tax code reform, achieved through traditional means like winning elections.

• Economic justice requires direct action and wealth redistribution. The candidate's platform aims to reclaim wealth he says was "stolen from the working people" by increasing taxes on corporations and billionaires. To achieve policy goals like Medicare for All, he encourages supporters to "impose costs" on uncooperative officials by publicly confronting them, ensuring they cannot "have a public dinner without getting yelled at." This approach is framed as a necessary way for citizens to exercise power, coupled with plans to expand Social Security.

Right Perspective

• The platform calls for abolishing a federal law enforcement agency. The candidate made a definitive call to abolish U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a federal agency. This proposal is accompanied by serious allegations, with Platner accusing its agents of "kidnapping people." His call for agents to be imprisoned and to testify without masks suggests a desire for a complete and confrontational dismantlement of the institution.

• The agenda includes breaking up major American corporations. Platner explicitly stated that if he had his way, large technology companies such as Google and Palantir "wouldn't exist." This position advocates for the forcible breakup of major firms using monopoly law. His justification is that these companies misuse data and deliberately make people angry, indicating a platform based on fundamentally restructuring a key sector of the economy.

• The proposed political tactics involve public confrontation. The candidate urged his supporters to engage in confrontational tactics against political opponents, specifically members of Maine's congressional delegation. He encouraged people to ensure these officials "cannot have a public dinner without getting yelled at." Platner described this as a method to "impose costs" and exercise power, raising questions about the nature of his proposed political discourse. The campaign did not respond to requests for comment on his remarks.

How it may affect me

As a U.S. reader:

• The proposed abolition of ICE would directly impact federal immigration enforcement. The article does not specify what, if anything, would replace the agency's functions.

• Breaking up tech firms like Google could alter or disrupt widely used consumer services. The plan involves applying monopoly law to these companies.

• Economic proposals to expand Social Security and raise corporate taxes could affect personal finances and business operations if enacted into federal law.

• The encouragement of confrontational tactics could change how politicians engage with the public, potentially leading to more frequent protests aimed at influencing officials.

Maine Senate Candidate Calls for Abolishing ICE, Breaking Up Tech Firms

The BareStory

Left Perspective

Right Perspective

How it may affect me

Read the story at