Illustration for: Climate Summit in Brazil Marked by Protests and US Federal Absence
AI-generated illustration. Visual interpretation does not represent real individuals or scenes.

Climate Summit in Brazil Marked by Protests and US Federal Absence

2025-11-15

The BareStory

The United Nations COP30 climate conference is underway in Belém, Brazil, where thousands of protesters marched on Saturday to pressure leaders for stronger action on climate change. Demonstrations during the week included an Indigenous group blocking an entrance and a disruption where two security guards reportedly sustained minor injuries. Overall attendance at the summit is lower than in previous years, with 53 national leaders present compared to 150 at a conference two years prior.

The United States federal government is not attending the talks. President Trump has called the event a "scam," and his administration has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement for a second time. In contrast, some state-level officials are in attendance, including California Governor Gavin Newsom and New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham. Governor Newsom criticized the federal government's absence, stating the U.S. should be engaging with Brazil.

At the summit, Governor Newsom entered into climate agreements with Brazil, Colombia, and Nigeria. He also declared that a reported Trump administration proposal to expand oil drilling off California's coast is "dead on arrival." The governor's stance comes as state data shows California's reliance on foreign oil has increased to 63.5%, while in-state production has declined during his tenure.

While some hope for progress on past financial commitments for developing nations, some participants and analysts reportedly do not expect major new agreements to emerge from the summit. A recent “State of the Global Climate report” confirmed that 2024 set new records for global temperatures, greenhouse gas emissions, and sea levels. According to the Climate Action Tracker, no country has taken sufficient action to meet the 2016 Paris Climate Accord targets.

Left Perspective

  • The summit serves as a vital platform for demanding stronger climate action.
  • State-level leaders are pursuing international cooperation despite federal absence.
  • The conference allows leaders to resist unaligned national policies.

Right Perspective

  • The US federal government has dismissed the conference's legitimacy.
  • The summit shows signs of waning participation and low expectations for outcomes.
  • The actions of some attendees are at odds with their domestic environmental track records.

How it may affect me

As a U.S. reader:

• Diverging federal and state climate policies could create uncertainty, with one governor vowing to block reported federal plans for new offshore oil drilling.

• California's rising reliance on foreign oil amidst declining local production could influence future energy prices and supply for residents of that state.

• The practical impact of new climate agreements between U.S. states and foreign nations is unclear, though this represents a shift in international policy engagement.

• Low expectations for new global accords mean that recent climate trends, such as record temperatures and sea levels, may continue without new international action.

Read the story at