Norway's Wealth Fund to Oppose Musk's Proposed $1 Trillion Pay Plan

2025-11-05

The BareStory

Norway's sovereign wealth fund has announced it will vote against a proposed compensation package for Tesla CEO Elon Musk that could be worth up to $1 trillion over the next decade. The fund, managed by Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), is a significant shareholder, holding a stake of over 1% in the electric vehicle manufacturer. Shareholders are voting on the new plan this week.

The proposal, introduced by Tesla’s board of directors, is a performance-based restricted stock award. According to a regulatory filing, the plan would also grant Musk increased voting power. For the full award to be unlocked, the company must achieve several long-term milestones, including reaching a market capitalization of $8.5 trillion, delivering 20 million vehicles, and producing one million self-driving "robotaxis" and one million "Optimus" humanoid robots.

In its decision, NBIM cited concerns about the award's "total size, dilution, and the lack of mitigation for key person risk," while also acknowledging the value created under Musk's leadership. The fund’s position contrasts with that of investor Baron Capital Management, whose founder announced support for the package, stating that Musk’s interests align with those of investors. Opposition has also reportedly come from proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis.

This is the second consecutive year NBIM has opposed a major pay package for Musk. Tesla board chairperson Robyn Denholm wrote in a letter to shareholders that Musk might leave his executive position if the proposal is rejected. Musk, who controls nearly 16% of Tesla's shares, has reportedly stated he could step down if the deal fails. Following NBIM’s announcement, Tesla shares were reported to be 2.5% lower in premarket trading.

Left Perspective

The proposal aligns the CEO's interests with those of investors.
The package is seen as necessary to retain crucial leadership.
The plan grants the CEO more control to achieve ambitious goals.

Right Perspective

The scale of the compensation package is a primary concern.
The plan creates shareholder dilution and lacks risk mitigation.
The vote reflects a recurring conflict over executive compensation.

Left Perspective

• The proposal aligns the CEO's interests with those of investors. According to supporters like Baron Capital Management, the performance-based nature of the compensation plan ensures that CEO Elon Musk's financial interests are directly tied to the success of the company. The package is only unlocked if Tesla achieves significant long-term milestones, meaning shareholders would also benefit from the substantial growth required to meet those targets.

• The package is seen as necessary to retain crucial leadership. Tesla’s board chairperson, Robyn Denholm, indicated in a letter to shareholders that Musk might leave his executive position if the proposal is rejected. This sentiment was reportedly echoed by Musk, who stated he could step down if the deal fails, framing the vote as essential for securing his continued leadership at the company.

• The plan grants the CEO more control to achieve ambitious goals. The proposal, introduced by Tesla's board of directors, would grant Musk increased voting power alongside the stock award. This is tied to achieving several transformational goals, including producing one million "robotaxis" and one million "Optimus" humanoid robots, suggesting supporters believe this increased control is vital for executing the company's long-term vision.

Right Perspective

• The scale of the compensation package is a primary concern. Norway's sovereign wealth fund (NBIM), a significant shareholder, cited the "total size" of the award as a key reason for its opposition. The fund views the potential $1 trillion value of the package as excessive, a position reportedly shared by proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis.

• The plan creates shareholder dilution and lacks risk mitigation. In its statement, NBIM noted concerns about the "dilution" the stock award would cause to existing shareholders, as well as a "lack of mitigation for key person risk." This perspective suggests the plan overly concentrates rewards and influence in one individual without adequate protection for investors should that individual's role at the company change.

• The vote reflects a recurring conflict over executive compensation. This is the second consecutive year that NBIM has opposed a major pay package for Musk, indicating a persistent disagreement over the structure and size of his compensation. The negative market reaction to the fund’s announcement, with Tesla shares reportedly falling 2.5% in premarket trading, highlights the weight that institutional opposition carries.

How it may affect me

As a U.S. reader:

• The vote's outcome could determine if Elon Musk remains CEO, potentially impacting the development of future products like self-driving robotaxis and humanoid robots.

• A short-term drop in Tesla's stock price was reported, which can affect the value of investments and retirement accounts holding the company's stock.

• If approved, the stock award could dilute the value of shares held by U.S. investors, a key concern raised by a major shareholder.

Norway's Wealth Fund to Oppose Musk's Proposed $1 Trillion Pay Plan

The BareStory

Left Perspective

Right Perspective

How it may affect me

Read the story at